“Love & Piece:” why slice-of-life just ain’t workin’
By Pontifus on 9 August 2008 | Anime, Features | 11 Comments
That’s not to say slice-of-life is bad, mind you. “Why slice-of-life just ain’t workin’” simply sounds more lively than “why the gulf of experience renders me unable to appreciate slice-of-life” — at least, it does when I write them both down and compare them. Pending my forsaking of academia in favor of the life of a starving artist (I graduate in December), I find that making critical jargon entertaining is beyond me - having scrapped the thousand or so boring words of this article’s first draft, I can now say that with certainty. IKnight, lelangir, cuchlann, I leave such things to you!
Indeed, though I enjoy criticism, I’m not much of a critic. I’m also not a fan of Lucky Star, and my opinion of the show got me into a bit of a tiff with an anime blogger of a higher order than myself. I suppose I don’t mind explaining in great detail why I feel the way I feel about a given fictional thing, provided the other party understands as well as myself that there can be no objectivity, no right or wrong, when dealing with the reading and/or viewing experience. The emotional charge generated in the space between consumer and text is both the most important part of any story (I’d argue) and one slippery bastard.
I do think there’s such a thing as a truly bad story, but I don’t consider Lucky Star to be truly bad, and that’s what I’d like to clarify here. Lucky Star is just a bad show for me, and now I know why I couldn’t look past its shallow characters as I’m able to look past the shallow characters in plenty of other shows: in the end, it’s a matter of plot. And, furthermore, Lucky Star’s “problem” isn’t exclusive to Lucky Star. It’s a slice-of-life thing.











